Pick the Type of Solution that Best Suits You
Contact us for quotation, we will give you the best pricing and advice!
GNSS time may not always be reliable
While architectures may differ, this is the basic approach to time & sync in cellular networks, and it usually works well. However, it does rely on a critical assumption: that the time generated from GNSS is accurate and reliable. In reality, that assumption may not always be true.
There are many reasons why the GNSS time signal may not always be accurate, from the presence of radio frequency (RF) interference to occasional errors in the satellite system itself. There’s an excellent summary of the issues on pages 10-13 of this , but for this blog I’ll focus on just one: multipath fragmentation of the GNSS signal.
Multipath is a threat to GNSS signal reception
Multipath is the effect produced when the GNSS signal encounters obstacles in its path to the receiver’s antenna. Tall buildings, trees, vehicles, and even the ground can cause the signal to reflect or diffract, such that it takes different paths to arrive at the antenna.
These different arrival times can cause deviations in the receiver’s measurement of the incoming GNSS signals, which, if not accounted for, will cause the receiver to output an inaccurate 1PPS time signal, adding jitter and consequently degrading network timing performance.
(For more about multipath, read our ebook: )
With the advent of 5G networks requiring many more base stations to be ever more tightly synchronised, it’s essential for GNSS chipset developers, as well as developers and users of PRTCs, to understand and mitigate the impact of multipath on timing and synchronisation accuracy.
Multipath effects are location-dependent and hard to measure
Measuring the impact of multipath on a PRTC is challenging, because so much depends on the exact location in which the PRTC antenna is installed. An antenna in an open area with a clear view of the sky will encounter few, if any, issues. But if the antenna is mounted in a dense urban area surrounded by tall buildings, multipath is highly likely to be a factor.
The exact nature of the multipath reflections will depend on the obstructions in the antenna’s specific surroundings, and are therefore difficult to generalise. It’s also difficult to conduct live tests at a physical location, because the test requires a reliable source of GNSS time to act as a control, which is impossible to obtain if multipath is present.
The solution is to simulate the effects of multipath in the lab, using a geo-realistic model of the location, with a radio frequency constellation simulator (RFCS) generating realistic GNSS signals, environment modelling software to model a 3D environment, and ray tracing software to model realistic multipath effects. In this setup, a receiver can be tested with and without multipath, and the tests can be reliably repeated with different variables.
A complete testbed for evaluating multipath
To help timing receiver developers and users assess the risks from multipath, Spirent and our partner Calnex have developed a complete simulation testbed to evaluate the impact of multipath on dedicated timing receivers.
The setup includes our Spirent GSS7000 multi-constellation, multi-frequency RF signal simulator, our for multipath simulation, and Calnex’s Paragon-X timing monitor to monitor the accuracy of the output 1PPS and PTP signals.
Using this setup, we tested three commercial receivers marketed for use in time & sync applications. Our aim was to understand the extent to which multipath can degrade the accuracy of the 1PPS output, and the consequent risk of not meeting the in PRTC-A reference clocks in cellular networks (+/- 100ns either side of UTC).
The units we tested included single-frequency and multiple-frequency multi-GNSS receivers and a flexible IEEE 1588 PRTC. We first tested each receiver in a simulated clear-sky environment without multipath, and then in three urban locations with realistically-simulated multipath signals: in downtown San Francisco, Manhattan and Shanghai. Each test ran over 24 hours.
Significant vulnerabilities discovered
The tests revealed multipath vulnerabilities in all three receivers. When the tests were run under clear-sky conditions, all three DUTs performed within the PRTC-A limits. But when tested in a dense urban environment, the DUTs showed significant degradation in the 1 PPS and the PTP measurements, well outside the PRTC-A limits defined in the ITU G.8272 standard.
Our tests clearly show that timing receivers that conform to timing accuracy standards in clear-sky conditions can experience significant degradation when installed in multipath-rich locations.
We would therefore recommend that manufacturers, integrators and purchasers of GNSS-dependent timing receivers test each receiver’s performance in the presence of multipath, and take action to mitigate any impact.
(For an example of a mitigation approach, read our case study of how
Spirent Sim3D software represents a major step forward in the simulation of multipath effects in real-world and geo-realistic 3D locations. The testbed described above is available for customer use in our UK lab.
Contact Telescience to learn more
Please sign in first.Sign in
Create a free account to save loved items.Sign in
Create a free account to use wishlists.Sign in